Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShakouri, Omolbanin
dc.contributor.authorAssad, Mamdouh El Haj
dc.contributor.authorAçıkkalp, Emin
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-29T12:07:04Z
dc.date.available2022-03-29T12:07:04Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationShakouri, O., Assad, M. E. H., & Açıkkalp, E. (2021). Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization performance of solid oxide fuel cell–Ericsson heat engine–reverse osmosis desalination. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 145(3), 1075-1090. doi:10.1007/s10973-020-10413-7en_US
dc.identifier.issn1588-2926
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-10413-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11552/2402
dc.description"Early Access"en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper targets to consider a hybrid cycle consisting of a solid oxide fuel cell and an Ericsson thermal engine that provides drinking water by connecting to a reverse osmosis desalination unit. First, a parametric assessment was performed on the target functions, including power, exergy destruction density, and fresh water production. After conducting studies on the composition of these target functions, three scenarios are defned for the simultaneous optimization of the mentioned functions. The frst scenario targets to optimize the exergy destruction density (Exd) and the fresh water production (mf ). In this scenario the exergy destruction and fresh water production have a better condition in the FUZZY approach, that the maximum value of the exergy destruction density and fresh water production are 450.879 (W m−2) and 2.078 (kg s −1), respectively. The second scenario attempts to optimize the power (P) and the fresh water production (mf ). According this scenario the power has the highest value in the FUZZY that is equal to 531.965 (KW), besides the fresh water production achieves to a maximum value in TOPSIS which it value is 0.365 (kg s −1). The third scenario considers optimizing the power (P), the fresh water production (mf ), and the exergy destruction density (Exd). The power (P) has permanent value in three decision-making which is equal 311.105 (KW), also the fresh water production (mf ) is 1.816 (kg s −1) in three decision-making and besides the exergy destruction density (Exd) has a constant value in three decision-making which is 30.439 (W m−2). In all three scenarios, the decision-making methods, such as TOPSIS, FUZZY, and LINMAP were appropriate to specify the ultimate solution between the beam fronts.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10973-020-10413-7en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSolid Oxide Fuel Cellen_US
dc.subjectReverse Osmosis Desalinationen_US
dc.subjectEricsson Engineen_US
dc.subjectIrreversibilityen_US
dc.subjectEnergy and Exergy Efcienciesen_US
dc.subjectMulti-objective Optimizationen_US
dc.subjectExergy Destruction Densityen_US
dc.titleThermodynamic analysis and multi‑objective optimization performance of solid oxide fuel cell–Ericsson heat engine–reverse osmosis desalinationen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetryen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-5356-1467en_US
dc.identifier.volume145en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1075en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1090en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.relation.indexScopusen_US
dc.relation.indexWoSen_US
dc.relation.indexWoS - Science Citation Index Expandeden_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorAçıkkalp, Emin
dc.description.wospublicationidWOS:000604537000002en_US
dc.authorscopusid55815632800en_US
dc.description.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.description.wosqualityQ2en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record