COMPARISON OF ANTIBACTERIAL AND ANTIFUNGAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT VARIETIES OF HONEY AND PROPOLIS SAMPLES

dc.authorid0000-0003-0437-6139
dc.authorid0000-0001-9365-334X
dc.authorid0000-0002-0729-9143
dc.authorid0000-0003-1047-8350
dc.contributor.authorKolayli, S.
dc.contributor.authorPalabiyik, I
dc.contributor.authorAtik, D. S.
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, M.
dc.contributor.authorBozdeveci, A.
dc.contributor.authorKaraoglu, S. A.
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-20T18:55:47Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentBilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractHoney is the most important bee product. There are many secondary metabolites, carbohydrates, enzymes, and vitamins in honey, thus, honey has antimicrobial activity. In this study, in vitro antimicrobial activity of forty-two honey and eight propolis ethanolic extracts (PEE) were investigated against 16 microorganisms. Total phenolic content ranged between 20.00-124.10 mg GAE/100 g and 103-232 mg GAE/g for honey and raw propolis samples, respectively. Pine and oak honeydew honeys had higher antimicrobial activity than four different grades of Manuka Honeys up to 18 mm minimtun inhibition zone diameters. The ethanolic propolis extracts showed much higher antimicrobial activity than the honey samples. Fungi species were inhibited by the propolis samples. Helicobacter pylori( (H. pylorii) was the most sensitive, whereas Streptococcus agalactiae was the most resistant bacteria among the studied microorganisms. Brazilian and Zonguldak propolis had the closest antimicrobial activity to ampicillin, streptomycin, and fluconazole. It can be concluded that both honey and propolis could be used in preservative and complementary medicine.
dc.description.sponsorshipTUBITAK [1147370]
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by TUBITAK [grant number 1147370].
dc.identifier.doi10.1556/066.2020.49.4.18
dc.identifier.endpage523
dc.identifier.issn0139-3006
dc.identifier.issn1588-2535
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85097262891
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage515
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1556/066.2020.49.4.18
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11552/7383
dc.identifier.volume49
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000590171200018
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWoS
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakWoS - Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAkademiai Kiado Zrt
dc.relation.ispartofActa Alimentaria
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250518
dc.subjectpine honey
dc.subjectoak honey
dc.subjectmanuka
dc.subjectBrazilian propolis
dc.subjectsynthetic antibiotic
dc.titleCOMPARISON OF ANTIBACTERIAL AND ANTIFUNGAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT VARIETIES OF HONEY AND PROPOLIS SAMPLES
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Makale.pdf
Boyut:
210.87 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format