Experimental comparative analysis of hybrid energy harvesters exposed to flow-induced vibrations

dc.authorid0000-0002-7284-2683
dc.authorid0000-0002-3783-2260
dc.contributor.authorBolat, Fevzi Cakmak
dc.contributor.authorBasaran, Sinan
dc.contributor.authorAbdelkefi, Abdessattar
dc.contributor.authorWang, Junlei
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-20T18:56:03Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentBilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractIn this study, hybrid energy harvesting based on electromagnetic induction (EM) and piezoelectric transduction (PZT) is experimentally investigated under different conditions of flow-induced vibrations. The energy harvesting performance of the system is examined when the electromagnetic and piezoelectric mechanisms are used both separately and simultaneously. In this regard, firstly, only electromagnetic induction harvesting structure is attached to a beam, and time-dependent voltage and displacement are experimentally investigated. Then, PZT has adhered to the beam, and voltage outputs are measured in both the PZT and EM circuits. The third scenario is based on removing the electromagnetic harvesting structure and only the piezoelectric energy harvesting performance is studied. The mentioned cases are investigated under different excitation circumstances, that is, distinct bluff-body geometries and flow velocities. While the square bluff-body geometry is connected to the structure, both PZT and EM harvested power are determined by considering different electrical load resistances. It is mainly revealed that the total energy amount is higher in the hybrid configuration. After determining the hybrid structure is the most effective, elements with different splitters geometry are attached to the bluff-body geometry of the harvesting structure. Finally, the vibration enhancement potential of these new types of splitters on the harvesting structure is experimentally investigated. For the solo electromagnetic harvester, the maximum power is obtained at an external load resistance value of 10 k omega, while for the solo PZT harvester, the maximum power is observed at the resistance value of 330 k omega. Among the three types of splitter geometries examined, the highest voltage was obtained from type-1 as 14.168 V.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/09544062221124831
dc.identifier.endpage672
dc.identifier.issn0954-4062
dc.identifier.issn2041-2983
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85139084158
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage664
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/09544062221124831
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11552/7535
dc.identifier.volume237
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000857969800001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWoS
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakWoS - Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of The Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C-Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250518
dc.subjectHybrid energy harvester
dc.subjectgalloping effect
dc.subjectsmart structures
dc.subjectsplitter geometry
dc.titleExperimental comparative analysis of hybrid energy harvesters exposed to flow-induced vibrations
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar