Changes of Stress Distributions Around Pterygomaxillary Junction With Different Osteotome Angulations

dc.authoridAyhan, Ali Osman/0000-0002-1023-4914
dc.authoridDilaver, Emrah/0000-0003-4522-1424
dc.authoridSUZEN, Muazzez/0000-0001-5121-9158
dc.contributor.authorDilaver, Emrah
dc.contributor.authorSuzen, Muazzez
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Oguzhan
dc.contributor.authorIric, Sedat
dc.contributor.authorAyhan, Ali O.
dc.contributor.authorUckan, Sina
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-20T18:56:24Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentBilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to investigate how the alteration of the angulation of osteotome at pterygomaxillary junction affects lateral pterygoid plate, maxillary tuberosity, palatal surface of maxilla, palatine bone and body of sphenoid bone. Following reconstruction of 3D modelling of maxilla, Osteotomes' tip was angulated 45 degrees and 90 degrees to sagittal plane to simulate pterygomaxillary osteotomy. Finite element analyses (FEA) was performed and Von Misses stress distributions were analyzed for two different angulations. Independent sample t test was used to compare differences between 45 degrees and 90 degrees angulations. Von Misses stress values on lateral pterygoid plate were higher in 45 degrees angulation (0.71 +/- 0.21 MPa) than 90 degrees angulation (0.54 +/- 0.28 MPa). This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). Placement of osteotome's tip with 90 degrees angulation had higher stress value than 45 degrees angulation on maxillary tuberosity region. However; difference wasn't significant (P = 0.44). Stress values on body of sphenoid bone were 0.45 +/- 0.17MPa for the case of 90 degrees angulation and 0.19 +/- 0.09MPa for 45 degrees angulation. Difference between these values were statistically significant (P < 0.01). Possible risk of unfavourable lateral pterygoid plate fracture and complications related with body of sphenoid bone during pterygomaxillary osteotomy was remarkably increased in case of narrow angulation (45 degrees). Keeping osteotome at right angle with sagittal plane may avoid these complications.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0000000000006397
dc.identifier.endpage1562
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pmid32310867
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85090250252
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage1560
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006397
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11552/7730
dc.identifier.volume31
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000605616600075
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWoS
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.indekslendigikaynakWoS - Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250518
dc.subjectAngulation of curved osteotome
dc.subjectfinite element analysis
dc.subjectlefort 1 osteotomy
dc.subjectpterygoid plates
dc.titleChanges of Stress Distributions Around Pterygomaxillary Junction With Different Osteotome Angulations
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar