Evaluating the role of post-harvest glyphosate application in enhancing weed control in winter wheat

dc.contributor.authorSerim, Ahmet Tansel
dc.contributor.authorAsav, Unal
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Yalcin
dc.contributor.authorBasaran, Buelent
dc.contributor.authorPatterson, Eric L.
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-20T19:01:19Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentBilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractChanges in the timing and intensity of spring rainfall have led to a significant increase in late-season weed emergence in T & uuml;rkiye. These newly emerged weeds tend to grow more vigorously due to the absence of competition with crops and other weeds during their development. Two field experiments were conducted in continuous monoculture winter wheat over three growing seasons (2020-2023) in T & uuml;rkiye. The first goal was to determine the impact of post-harvest herbicide (PHH) on the critical time for weed removal (CTWR) in winter wheat, and the second goal was to evaluate the effects of PHH combined with various weed control treatments on weed populations, the soil seed bank, and crop yield. The experiment followed a split-plot design, with the PHH regimes and weed removal timing or weed control treatments serving as the main and sub-plots, respectively. The herbicide regime included post-harvest glyphosate potassium salt (PHG) applied at 2.646 kg ai ha(-1) and No PHG. Weed removal timings were set at 10-day intervals, from 0 to 110 days after wheat emergence (DAE). Weedy and weed-free controls were included for comparison. The weed control treatments involved post-emergence tribenuron-methyl at 7.5 g ai ha(-1) and hand weeding. The application of the PHG delayed the CTWR from 416 growing degree days (GDD) to 516.5 GDD in 2022 and from 465.6 GDD to 661.2 GDD in 2023, effectively preventing yield loss. The combined use of PHG with post-emergence tribenuron-methyl or hand weeding maximized wheat yield while minimizing the weed flora and the size of the soil seed bank.
dc.description.sponsorshipGeneral Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policy (TAGEM) [TAGEM/BSAD/E/20/A2/P4/1803]
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policy (TAGEM), project code is TAGEM/BSAD/E/20/A2/P4/1803. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
dc.identifier.doi10.7717/peerj.19177
dc.identifier.issn2167-8359
dc.identifier.pmid40183056
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105001537982
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19177
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11552/9114
dc.identifier.volume13
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001477679300001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWoS
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.indekslendigikaynakWoS - Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPeerj Inc
dc.relation.ispartofPeerj
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250518
dc.subjectWinter wheat
dc.subjectPost-harvest herbicide
dc.subjectSoil seed bank
dc.subjectGlyphosate potassium salt
dc.subjectTribenuron-methyl
dc.subjectGrowing degree days
dc.subjectCritical time for weed removal
dc.titleEvaluating the role of post-harvest glyphosate application in enhancing weed control in winter wheat
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar